Our purpose

PerspeQtive builds AI for physical signals

We turn raw radar into mission-grade intelligence.

In radar, the richest information lives in the phase and wave structure, before the signal ever becomes an image. Standard computer vision throws it away. We read the full wave.

A magnifier over a grid of radar returns, revealing structure hidden in the signal
Scroll

What we build

AI for physical signals

Where we start

Raw radar / SAR

What you get

Mission-grade intelligence

AI's current blind spot

The most valuable radar data is discarded by AI models

Radar data contains two signals: amplitude and phase. Current AI models only learn from amplitude, and throw phase away.

Sensor output: full radar data

Full signal: amplitude + phase captured

The AI bottleneck

Phase is discarded: 50% data loss

Blind decisions

Amplitude-only models fail: missed targets, false alarms

50%

Raw data thrown away

M$

Lost at the software layer

The lost information, visually

When radar becomes a black & white image

Most AI models treat phase as noise and discard it, becoming blind to valuable physical signals.

Sensor output: amplitude + phase
Sensor output: amplitude + phase Raw wave
Phase removed: amplitude only
Phase removed: amplitude only Flatten & compress
AI interpretation
AI interpretation Phase-blind output

What gets destroyed

Phase texture · material signature · millimetric variations

Same scene, two readouts

Drag to see what the phase recovers

Left: what an amplitude-only model learns from. Right: the same return read with the full wave. Same sensor, same pixels — the difference is the phase.

The same radar return seen by an amplitude-only model The same radar return read with the full wave by PerspeQtive Full wave · PerspeQtive Amplitude only

The core

An engine that reads the full wave

Our engine reads amplitude and phase on standard GPUs: the part of the signal others discard. It's built and validated on real SAR today, and it's the core we build our radar models on. No quantum hardware.

Classical interpretation of a radar return
Classical interpretation
PerspeQtive quantum-inspired readout of the same radar return, with more structure recovered
PerspeQtive quantum-inspired readout Ours
Your raw SAR archive
Full-wave engine
Models that see more

Our edge is mathematical. We use quantum mathematics to represent wave structure that image-based AI can't, running at AI speed on standard GPUs.

Runs on standard NVIDIA GPUs No quantum hardware First patent being filed Pre-incubated · Quantum Launchpad

Why now · where it matters

Phase unlocks what amplitude-only AI can't see

Across today's defining theaters — Ukraine, the Middle East, Europe's contested seas — the easy signal (transponders, GPS, clean imagery) is failing or being spoofed. Here's what reading the full wave makes possible, and the missions where it matters.

Ukraine

Decoy discrimination

Problem
Amplitude-only can’t tell real assets from decoys.
Phase information
Phase stability exposes the material: metal vs rubber.
Operational output
Fewer false positives, fewer wasted resources.
The Middle East

Millimetric perturbations

Problem
The signal lives only in the phase, not the amplitude.
Phase information
Millimetric surface changes and coherence shifts between passes.
Operational output
Detect buried structures, tunnels, and route tracks.
Baltic · Strait of Hormuz

Moving target intelligence

Problem
Vessels go dark or spoof AIS, and noise defeats non-AI methods.
Phase information
Micro-Doppler and coherence patterns survive in the phase.
Operational output
Estimate motion and velocity of untracked vehicles and boats.

The same phase powers Europe's millimetric monitoring of dams, bridges and rail (Copernicus European Ground Motion Service). Context drawn from NATO critical-infrastructure operations, reported GNSS interference at major straits, and open SAR / InSAR literature.

Benchmarks — measured on SAR archive data

Measured gains before the mission model runs

+0 dB

Target contrast gap

TCR median: +7.32 dB vs +0.74 dB

The detector sees the target more clearly before classification.

Class separation

Fisher: 0.413 vs 0.194

Fewer object classes get confused at the decision boundary.

+0pp

Speckle robustness

Accuracy in noise: 71.6% vs 53.2%

Works on raw SAR, not just cleaned imagery.

Measured on real SAR archive data, against a like-for-like classical baseline.

Our vision

Making raw radar directly usable by AI

Today the world’s radar archives are read as images, and most of the signal is discarded. Our goal is to own the path from raw signal to trusted intelligence, everywhere wave physics carries the answer. Radar first, physical signals beyond.

The company that makes raw radar waves usable by AI.

Defense Maritime Infrastructure

European, built for sovereign deployment.

Background & vision

Ruben Maarek

The technical foundation

Developed GPU-accelerated quantum simulation software at QbitSoft and complex algorithms at J.P. Morgan, specializing in processing high-dimensional mathematics on standard hardware.

Built the core engine

Independently coded and validated PerspeQtive's core quantum-inspired vision layer, achieving a proven +6.58 dB target contrast improvement on raw Level-1 SLC radar data.

Current focus & structure

Actively onboarding a CTO to deploy the AI models. Pre-incubation in Quantum Launchpad.

Ruben Maarek, Founder & CEO of PerspeQtive

Founder & CEO

CentraleSupélec / NUS Singapore

Master in Quantum Machine Learning

Start here

See what your AI is missing on your archive radar data

The word PerspeQtive emerging from radar noise

What is hidden in your raw signals has value.

Request a data feasibility study contact@perspeqtiveai.com

Start with a data study: we run our engine on your SAR archive and show you what the phase recovers.